The Truth about Jim Cramer and CNBC (Part 1)

I first began my mission helping investors steer clear of Wall Street because I learned first hand how the game was played after having worked in the industry. 

My mission has been to help investors become more knowledgeable and successful by providing cutting-edge investment research as well as top-notch educational content. I think I've done quite well in that regard. 

Unfortunately, most people have forgotten how critical it is to know the credibility and reliability of the sources they choose to follow.

Instead of checking credentials and track records, they go by the number of likes, fake comments and reviews and heresay from people they have no idea about. 

Those who are unfamiliar with me can find out more about my credentials, my background, as well as my investment research track record here, here, and here.

The reader can examine my track record of predicting the 2008 financial crisis and enabling investors to capture life-changing profits by checking here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.

As I have discussed in the past, the financial media constantly portrays the impression that it provides its audience with valuable content from "experts." However, as the facts indicate this is rarely the case.

Like all professional marketers realize, once you have an audience you can tell them anything you want and they will believe you. Simply turning on the TV or picking up the newspaper sends the signal that you want to be lied to.

The biggest sleaze ball marketers and copywriting clowns target CNBC for their bag of scams because CNBC is in the business of lies and securities manipulation.  And of course we cannot forget that Cramer uses CNBC to constantly promote his boiler room company, The Street and it's jug head contributers.

In this article, we will take a closer look at Jim Cramer, Ben Stein and other clowns affiliated with Cramer and CNBC. 

Before I begin, I wanted to address a question that might seem trival. 

Is Jim Cramer as Smart as He Claims?

As I have discussed in the past, the financial media constantly portrays the impression that it provides its audience with valuable content from "experts." As the facts indicate, this is rarely the case.

A key component of this scheme to position its guests and hosts as "trusted authorities" always involves mention of how “smart” they are, so as to reinforce the ALWAYS biased and OFTEN inaccurate commentary of its "experts."

Jim Cramer serves as the foundation of CNBC. As such, once you become aware of the truth about Cramer, you will realize that CNBC is nothing more than a criminal organization hiding behind the shield "Free Speech" rights, much like the other segments of the media.

CNBC constantly misguides its audience through both ignorance and intentional deceit. And Cramer does a great job promoting himself as an "investor advocate" and "intelligent investor," despite facts that point to the contrary.

In order to remind his audience why they need to tune into his investment infomercials, Cramer likes to tell everyone that he is smart. He does this using many subtle tactics, most commonly by his “when I was at Harvard” line, as if this has any relevance whatsoever pertaining to the investment process.

His media lackeys also claim he is “smart” when introducing him as the "successful" or "legendary" hedge fund manager. And of course Cramer always tells his audience how "smart" the CEOs are when he pumps their stocks.

If in fact graduating from Harvard has any bearing on Cramer’s abilities to provide reliable recommendations (instead of flip-flopping and getting his sheep audience to buy at the top and sell at the bottom), he should demand a refund of all tuition costs.

Getting into Harvard or any other top university often has little to do with one’s intelligence or abilities beyond a certain level. I too graduated from a top university, but that has nothing to do with my success in the investment world. I have solid results, a great track record to prove my competance.

Cramer has a terrible track record so he tries to focus on superficial things to get his sheep to think he knows what he's talking about.  In my assessment Jim Cramer is a complete con man and investment disaster. 

The Jewish Advantage

If you happen to be Jewish, your chances of getting into Harvard or any other major university (especially in the Ivy League) are exponentially higher than for everyone else (with the possible exception of blacks or American Indians) because Jews run most major universities, and they completely run every university in the Ivy League.  

This is something you rarely if ever hear mention of, but I can guarantee you it’s a fact.

The power of Jewish networking enables Jews to get into virtually any university they want, much in the same as they are able to land the best jobs in the media and banking, as well of the rest of corporate America. The same applies to the public sector.

If you aren't convinced, simply check who the media executives, producers and editors are, the banking executives, fund managers and analysts, the corporate executives and board members of the largest corporations, and top officials of government agencies. Check the Supreme Court too. Where ever you look, you see the disriminatory impact of Jewish networking. This is a very powerful 2%.

Some of you reading this who are Jewish may not want to accept what I am telling you, especially if you have not benefited from such favoritism, but this behavior is indeed commonplace. I know this from years of observation as well as confirmation from Jews and non-Jews alike.

[In the near future I am going to publish an article that gives you an example of how Jewish individuals also make sure to look after each other in the corporate world.]

So what's the problem with this? 

After all, everyone tries to help their friends and family out right? 

Certainly. It's human nature to want to do favors for your friends and family. That's why people network, right? 

The problem is that Jewish people take this "assistance" to an extreme when they engage in Jewish networking activities. They have a "them" versus "us" mentality which one could argue places non-Jews as the "enemy" in the eyes of Jews.

The end result is that Jewish networking takes huge amounts of earning potential away from millions of individuals who are more qualified and more deserving.

When considering the adverse impact of Jewish networking in the media, the damage is extremely severe. By flooding the media with morons with terrible track records simply for the fact that they are Jewish, those who are foolish enough to spend time paying attention to the media end up being steered into the gutter.

As a Jewish individual, even if you do not participate in Jewish networking, being Jewish isn't going to save you from the terrible advice pumped out by the clowns in the media. In this respect you are just as vulnerable as everyone else. 

Furthermore, even if you do not pay attention to the media, you will also be adversely affected because the media works together with Wall Street to execute various types of securities manipulation and fraud, such as insider trading, front running and pump-and-dump schemes, like the recent one we have seen in social media.

How Jewish Networking Destroys Your Investments

There are countless skills required to become a really good investor. Most of these skills are not taught in a college setting for a variety of reasons.

First, business, finance and economics professors have no idea what it takes to become a really good investor. The best they can do is teach theory and investment basics. But none of this necessarily leads to investment success. I argue that it leads to disaster more often than not.

Thus, the university one attended has very little bearing on how well you understand the investment process. If anyone proves that beyond a shadow of a doubt, it’s Cramer.

Before I go into more detail regarding Jim Cramer, I want to point to a few additional examples whereby Jewish networking has enriched individuals who are undeserving of the career and economic opportunities. Note that these two examples are merely a drop in the bucket.

Jeremy Siegel is a business professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School of Business.

As a university professor, Mr. Siegel seems to devote an inordinate amount of time in the media. One would expect him to be focused on his academic duties instead (the same applies to Paul Krugman and many other Jews who are promoted in the media).

Despite the fact that Mr. Siegel's knowledge about investments appears to be restricted to basics and irrelevant theories, and although he does not have the ability to forecast the market or the economy, Mr. Siegel is one of the "go-to" guys used by the media. Just look at his track record. Examine what he has stated in the past, and then check the results and you will see that Mr. Siegel belongs in a class room teaching the ABCs of investing.

Let's take a look at another Jewish pinhead who is constantly promoted in the financial media; Ben Stein. Stein has an economics degree from Columbia, but he never worked on Wall Street. He has worked in Hollywood, which adds to his appeal as a commentator for investment media, since the media likes to create "entertainment" out of serious financial content.

Similar to Siegel, Stein has a horrendous track record. Both of these men serve as perma-bulls. As such, they fit perfectly with Larry Kudlow's (who is also Jewish by blood) political agendas, which are to empower America's crony capitalism.

Both of these men join their Jewish peers who are constantly being promoted by the media as experts despite their miserable track records. Beyond a generic understanding of investments, neither of these men really has any idea what they are talking about. And they certainly have no ability to navigate the market. Thus, they have no business being interviewed on financial shows. Yet they are constantly being promoted by the financial media as "experts." This free promotion not only opens the door for many economic opportunities for these men, it also floods the media with clueless idiots. 

As a result of being pimped by the media, these men benefit from more book sales, more opportunities to get paid for serving on corporate and other boards. They also get paid big bucks to speak at large events offering their "investment wisdom."

I could go on to mention many other Jewish individuals who have been made into media celebrities despite their lack of understanding of the financial markets, and/or their politically-motivated rants, which serve to value other than to brainwash their audience.

Nouriel Roubini and Paul Krugman are two other Jewish professors who seem to spend an inordinate amount of time in the media. Why aren't these guys spending more time teaching?

The only ones who benefit when the media gives these guys airtime is them. And their audience suffers. I addressed this issue in a previous publication. See here.

A Closer Look at Ben Stein

Using his Jewish ties and media exposure (which is also due to his Jewish ties), Stein was invited to be a paid writer for the very Jewish owned New York Times.

To give you an idea of Stein's character, he used his "media celebrity" to cash in as a whore for a predatory credit monitoring service called FreeScore. In video ads for FreeScore, Stein claimed that you could sign up on the site to receive credit scores from all three monitoring organizations. But once you signed up, you were enrolled in a credit monitoring service that charged $29.95/month. Ben Stein is not only an idiot, he is a scam artist.