Start Here

Doug Casey Has Been Pitching the Exact Same Lines for 40 Years. And His Track Record is Really MISERABLE!

As you watch this interview from 1980, I want you to notice how Casey is questioned by the audience.

Members of the audience question Doug Casey's credibility as well as his motives.

Today people do not question anything. Today the masses have been completely dumbed down as a result of the chronic effects of media consumption.  This is in large part why so many people lack the most basic critical reasoning skills. I see it everyday. Yet these same people actually think they are on top of things because they consume massive amounts of media.

Folks, it's never been about HOW MUCH information one consumes but being able to recognize the QUALITY of the information and having the ability to analyze and process this information effectively. 

You should also take note that Casey's book Crisis Investing was completely wrong and caused those who took his advice to really lose their ass.

Do you see a trend here?

Fast forward some forty years later and we see guys like Peter Schiff, Jim Rogers, Jim Rickards, Harry Dent and so on being promoted by the media as credible experts despite the contrary, and despite the fact that they have ridiculously pathetic track records.

Do really you think the media promotes these clowns over and over by accident, not knowing how ridiculous their claims are and how wrong they have been? 

Wake up. The media is out to take your money via the ad-based business model.

And the Jewish media crime bosses always seem to partner up with members of their tribe who pitch fear and doom while making millions upon millions of dollars selling useless books, newsletters and so on.

Where do you think that money came from?

It came from the suckers who were foolish enough to pay attention to the media, whether it be so-called mainstream or (even worse) so-called alternative.   

 

 

Membership Resources

 

 

Mike Stathis holds the best investment forecasting track record in the world since 2006.

View Mike Stathis' Track Record herehere, hereherehere, here and here.

 

Check here to download Chapter 12 of Cashing in on the Real Estate Bubble.

 

This is the chapter that shows where Mike recommended shorting Fannie, Freddie, sub-primes, homebuilders, GM, GE, etc.

 

 

 

So why does the media continue to BAN Stathis? 

 

Why does the media constantly air con men who have lousy track records?

These are critical questions to be answered.

You need to confront the media with these questions. 

Watch the following videos and you will learn the answer to these questions:

You Will Lose Your Ass If You Listen To The Media

 

 

 


 


Restrictions Against Reproduction: No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the Publisher.

These articles and commentaries cannot be reposted or used in any publications for which there is any revenue generated directly or indirectly. These articles cannot be used to enhance the viewer appeal of any website, including any ad revenue on the website, other than those sites for which specific written permission has been granted. Any such violations are unlawful and violators will be prosecuted in accordance with these laws.

Article 19 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

This publication (written, audio and video) represents the commentary and/or criticisms from Mike Stathis or other individuals affiliated with Mike Stathis or AVA Investment Analytics (referred to hereafter as the “author”). Therefore, the commentary and/or criticisms only serve as an opinion and therefore should not be taken to be factual representations, regardless of what might be stated in these commentaries/criticisms. There is always a possibility that the author has made one or more unintentional errors, misspoke, misinterpreted information, and/or excluded information which might have altered the commentary and/or criticisms. Hence, you are advised to conduct your own independent investigations so that you can form your own conclusions. We encourage the public to contact us if we have made any errors in statements or assumptions. We also encourage the public to contact us if we have left out relevant information which might alter our conclusions. We cannot promise a response, but we will consider all valid information.


0:00
0:00