Mike Stathis Foresaw the Problems With US Trade Policy Back in 2006 (early release video)

By now if you're reading this then you probably already realize I, Mike Stathis hold not only the leading track record on the economic collapse, but also the leading investment forecasting track record since 2006. 

Much of Mike Stathis' track record can be accessed here, herehere, here, here, here and here.  

And I have even backed these claims with a $1 million guarantee to the first person who could prove this not to be the case.  See here.   

I believe it's quite noteworthy to understand that no one else in the world has ever backed claims like this with any type of monetary guarantee.  

Ask yourself why I continue to be banned by ALL MEDIA (including the so-called "alternative media" which is a bigger joke than the "mainstream media").

Once you come to truly understand why I have been banned, you will then realize how the game is played by ALL MEDIA to lie, con and distract you.  All ad-based content is a complete scam designed to get you to play the patsy by creating demand for content that's linked to ads. And the content ranges from slanted to complete bull shit. The fact is that if you're paying attention to any media, you're being lied to, deceived, distracted and conned.  

I'm not going to write much here because the video below is quite long and self-explanatory.

In essence, I claim that my 2006 landmark book, America's Financial Apocalypse as the best investment-related book ever written based on the detail, scope and accuracy of the predictions, the complexity and accuracy of insights, and the number of problems that have since come to the forefront some 12 years later.

This claim will be proven by publishing some excerpts from this landmark book first published in 2006. 

I know of no other investment-related book ever been written that comes close to the measuring stick I have defined here. Yet, the book was barred by the publishing industry. And I have since been black-balled by all media (including so-called "alternative media).  Hence, very few people have read the book.

Some who may have read the book might have been unable to fully interpret the full relevance of the material in a comprehensive manner due to confirmation bias after having been indoctrinated from the intake of years of nonsense from the media's so-called "experts," all of which have continued to be wrong, none of which has any real credibility, some of which have been involved in fraud, all of which are only experts in sales and marketing.   

Even after watching or even studying the video below, I am quite confident that some who are not so familiar with me or my work will still be unable to understand the relevance of this book. Consequently, this merely points to the sad state of the intelligence level of the masses. 

In short, if you ever find anyone who has read the original extended version of America's Financial Apocalypse (2006) but does not speak of it with nothing but the utmost praise, you can be assured that you have run across an individual who is clueless about investments, suffers from some form of mental illness, cognitive dissonance, confirmation bias, or some other disruptive mental process which stands in the way of objective thinking.

As a final note, I have recently confirmed my suspicions that certain members of the Trump administration have in fact used the book as a reference for issues pertaining to US trade policy.

Once you read the excerpts from the book (in the video below) you will realize that it's very possible (if not highly likely) that Trump obtained many of his talking points from the book. 

Remember folks. The media is a criminal organization that seeks to screw its audience by delivering deceptive content designed to please its financial sponsors (i.e. advertisers). I have proven this over and over in hundreds of articles, videos and audios for more than a decade.

But when serious individuals including industry leading professionals want world-class insights and research they come to me. 

Do you really think serious professionals seek out the clowns in the media who are promoted as experts? 

Even the most credible Wall Street firms come up short when stacked against my track record. 

This might explain why some of our research clients are from Wall Street. 

Note: this video is being released in advance without having been fully edited.  We wanted to release it now because the final version might not be completed for a couple of months due to our busy schedule.  


Restrictions Against Reproduction: No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the copyright owner and the Publisher.

These articles and commentaries cannot be reposted or used in any publications for which there is any revenue generated directly or indirectly. These articles cannot be used to enhance the viewer appeal of any website, including any ad revenue on the website, other than those sites for which specific written permission has been granted. Any such violations are unlawful and violators will be prosecuted in accordance with these laws.

Article 19 of the United Nations' Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

This publication (written, audio and video) represents the commentary and/or criticisms from Mike Stathis or other individuals affiliated with Mike Stathis or AVA Investment Analytics (referred to hereafter as the “author”). Therefore, the commentary and/or criticisms only serve as an opinion and therefore should not be taken to be factual representations, regardless of what might be stated in these commentaries/criticisms. There is always a possibility that the author has made one or more unintentional errors, misspoke, misinterpreted information, and/or excluded information which might have altered the commentary and/or criticisms. Hence, you are advised to conduct your own independent investigations so that you can form your own conclusions. We encourage the public to contact us if we have made any errors in statements or assumptions. We also encourage the public to contact us if we have left out relevant information which might alter our conclusions. We cannot promise a response, but we will consider all valid information.